Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
The focusing inversion of gravity and magnetic potential-field data using the randomized singular value decomposition (RSVD) method is considered. This approach facilitates tackling the computational challenge that arises in the solution of the inversion problem that uses the standard and accurate approximation of the integral equation kernel. We have developed a comprehensive comparison of the developed methodology for the inversion of magnetic and gravity data. The results verify that there is an important difference between the application of the methodology for gravity and magnetic inversion problems. Specifically, RSVD is dependent on the generation of a rank [Formula: see text] approximation to the underlying model matrix, and the results demonstrate that [Formula: see text] needs to be larger, for equivalent problem sizes, for the magnetic problem compared to the gravity problem. Without a relatively large [Formula: see text], the dominant singular values of the magnetic model matrix are not well approximated. We determine that this is due to the spectral properties of the matrix. The comparison also shows us how the use of the power iteration embedded within the randomized algorithm improves the quality of the resulting dominant subspace approximation, especially in magnetic inversion, yielding acceptable approximations for smaller choices of [Formula: see text]. Further, we evaluate how the differences in spectral properties of the magnetic and gravity input matrices also affect the values that are automatically estimated for the regularization parameter. The algorithm is applied and verified for the inversion of magnetic data obtained over a portion of the Wuskwatim Lake region in Manitoba, Canada.more » « less
-
An efficient algorithm for the Lp -norm joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data using the cross-gradient constraint is presented. The presented framework incorporates stabilizers that use Lp -norms ( 0≤p≤2 ) of the model parameters, and/or the gradient of the model parameters. The formulation is developed from standard approaches for independent inversion of single data sets, and, thus, also facilitates the inclusion of necessary model and data weighting matrices, for example, depth weighting and hard constraint matrices. Using the block Toeplitz Toeplitz block structure of the underlying sensitivity matrices for gravity and magnetic models, when data are obtained on a uniform grid, the blocks for each layer of the depth are embedded in block circulant circulant block matrices. Then, all operations with these matrices are implemented efficiently using 2-D fast Fourier transforms, with a significant reduction in storage requirements. The nonlinear global objective function is minimized iteratively by imposing stationarity on the linear equation that results from applying linearization of the objective function about a starting model. To numerically solve the resulting linear system, at each iteration, the conjugate gradient algorithm is used. This is improved for large scale problems by the introduction of an algorithm in which updates for the magnetic and gravity parameter models are alternated at each iteration, further reducing total computational cost and storage requirements. Numerical results using a complicated 3-D synthetic model and real data sets obtained over the Galinge iron-ore deposit in the Qinghai province, north-west (NW) of China, demonstrate the efficiency of the presented algorithm.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT We present a brief review of the widely used and well‐known stabilizers in the inversion of potential field data. These include stabilizers that useL2,L1andL0norms of the model parameters and the gradients of the model parameters. These stabilizers may all be realized in a common setting using two general forms with different weighting functions. Moreover, we show that this unifying framework encompasses the use of additional stabilizations which are not common for potential field inversion.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
